Md. Izhar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.3423 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -26 Year- 2016 Thana -MAHILA P.S District- SUPAUL ====================================================== Md. Izhar, Son of Late Md. Mazid, Resident of Village- Hulas, Police Station- Raghopur, District- Supaul.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Harun Quareshi For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ataur Rahman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 07-03-2018 Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected by this Court vide order dated 15.2.2017 passed in Cr.Misc.No. 5092 of 2017 with a direction to learned trial court to expedite the trial and try to conclude it within a period of nine months and if not, petitioner was given liberty to renew his prayer for bail. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that period of nine months has already expired and trial has not been concluded.

Heard learned APP also and perused the report from which it appears that all the witnesses have been examined except Doctor and learned trial court has requested for four months further time to conclude the trial.

Having heard both sides and in the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3423 of 2018 (4) dt.07-03-2018 2/2 circumstances, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Hence, prayer for bail is rejected.

However, learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude it within a period of further four months from the receipt of this order.

With the above observation, this application is dismissed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U