Ajit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.46692 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -155 Year- 2017 Thana -CHATOUNI DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================
1. Ajit Kumar Son of Chhote Lal Rai, resident of Village- Chandrahiya, Gumsta Tola, Police Station- Muffasil, District- East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shakti Suman Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Parmanand Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 21-09-2017 Heard the parties.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in Chhatauni P.S. Case No.155 of 2017 registered for the offence under Sections 366 and 120(B) of the I.P.C.
Allegation against the petitioner is of kidnapping the minor daughter of the informant.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that First Information Report itself shows that there was love affair in between the petitioner and the informant got his daughter married with some other person. The victim girl has not supported the prosecution story in her statement recorded under Section 161 of Cr.P.C., but paragraphs no. 10 and 11 of the petition shows that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he is in
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46692 of 2017 (2) dt.21-09-2017 2/2 custody since 28.06.2017.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, in Chhatauni P.S. Case No. 155 of 2017 subject to the conditions that (1) one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court. (2) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(3) The petitioner shall co-operate in disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court. In the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) AnilKrSinha/- U