← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./19104/2023partly allowed disposal

Yadu Pal @ Jadu Pal v. The State Of Bihar

2023-07-06Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19104 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-508 Year-2022 Thana- AMAS District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

Yadu Pal @ Jadu Pal Son Of Ram Prasad Pal R/V- Khaira Khurd P.S- Amas Dist- Gaya 2.

Raghunandan Pal Son Of Ram Prasad Pal R/V- Khaira Khurd P.S- Amas Dist- Gaya 3.

Upendra Pal Son Of Ram Prasad Pal R/V- Khaira Khurd P.S- Amas DistGaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vijay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ganesh Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 06-07-2023 Learned counsel for the petitioners does not want to press this application with regard to petitioner no. 3. Accordingly, this application with regard to petitioner no. 3 is dismissed as not pressed.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State for consideration of bail with regard to rest of the petitioners.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 325, 354, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioners are said to have committed mar-pit with the informant by means of lathi.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19104 of 2023(3) dt.06-07-2023 2/2 petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case due to land dispute. He submits that there is case and counter case between the parties. He submits that there is no specific overt act against the petitioners. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioners. He further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner nos. 1 and 2 in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Amas P.S. Case No. 508 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

devendra/- (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) U T