Patna High CourtCR. MISC./24168/2016disposed

Jai Dev Dahiya And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2016-09-02Mr. Justice Dinesh Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.24168 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -331 Year- 2015 Thana -KOTWALI District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Jai Dev Dahiya, Son of Sri Om Prakash Dahiya, Resident of 40 , Bhagwan Budha, Apartment of Pitam Ura, P.S.- Mangol Puri, Distt.- New Delhi.

2. Vijay Agarwal, son of Gokul Chand Agarwal, Resident of E/404, Sai Baba App,Sector -9, Rohini, P.S.- Prashant Vihar, Distt New Delhi,

3. Rajeev Sood ,. Son of Vijay Kumar Sood, Resident of Director, Roots Infotech Solution (P), Ltd. 1102-1104, Pearls Best Height-1 Pitampura, P.S. Netaji Subhash Place, Distt.- New Delhi- 110034.

4. Atul Son of Jai Praksah Goel, Resident of 483, Arya, Samaj Gali, Near Delhi Gate, Najafgarh, South, West P.S.- Najafgarh Distt.- Delhi. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Rakesh Verma son of Satyadeo Narayan Verma, Jahanvi Eductech Private Limited, Flat No. 101, Leela Apartment, Gorakhnath compond (Glass House), East Boring Canal Road, P.S.- Budha Colony Patna800001 (Bihar). .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeet Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Uday Chand Pd.(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02-09-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

The present application has been filed for quashing the First Information Report of Patna Kotwali P.S. Case No. 331 of 2015 registered under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

Mr. Vikash Nagwan, learned counsel for the petitioners very fairly submits that final report under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C has already been submitted and consequently

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24168 of 2016 (2) dt.02-09-2016 2/2 order of cognizance has been passed. It is further submitted that the issue has been resolved between the parties and a joint compromise petition has been filed before learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna which has been brought on record as Annexure-2.

In the circumstances, the application has become infructuous.

Accordingly the application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna on submission of final report.

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Shageer/- U T