Ramlesh Yadav @ Nata Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.49870 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -382 Year- 2014 Thana -UDWANTNAGAR District- BHOJPUR ====================================================== Ramlesh Yadav @ Nata Yadav Son of Late Lallu Yadav Resident of Village - Khalisa, P.S. - Udwantnagar, District - Bhojpur. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Vinod Shankar Modi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 17-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.
Petitioner happens to be main assailant and earlier his prayer for bail was twice rejected by this court and again, this court is not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, his prayer for bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 139 of 2017 arising out of Udwantnagar P.S. Case No. 382 of 2014 pending in the court of 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Bhojpur at Ara stands rejected.
The trial court has reported that charge against the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49870 of 2017 (4) dt.17-01-2018 2/2 petitioner was framed on 01.09.2017 but up till now, not a single prosecution witness has been examined though the bailable warrants have already been issued to prosecution witnesses. The copy of this order be sent to Superintendent of Police, Bhojpur at Ara with direction to him to ensure the presence of prosecution witnesses of Sessions Trial No. 139 of 2017 arising out of Udwantnagar P.S. Case No. 382 of 2014 before the court of 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Bhojpur at Ara without any delay. The trial court should also take necessary steps to procure the attendance of prosecution witnesses and try to conclude the trial of the petitioner as early as possible. (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) SHAHZAD/- U T