Mahanth Mahto v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17688 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-256 Year-2021 Thana- MOHAMMADPUR District- Gopalganj ====================================================== 1.
Mahanth Mahto, Son Of Chandrma Mahto Resident Of Village - Amarpur, P.S.- Mahammadpur, District - Gopalganj.
2.
Lakhpatiya Devi, Wife Of Mahanth Mahto Resident Of Village - Amarpur, P.S.- Mahammadpur, District - Gopalganj.
3.
Sanjay Mahto, Son Of Mahanth Mahto Resident Of Village - Amarpur, P.S.- Mahammadpur, District - Gopalganj.
4.
Punam Devi, Wife Of Sanjay Mahto Resident Of Village - Amarpur, P.S.- Mahammadpur, District - Gopalganj.
... ... Petitioner/S
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar
2. Pooja Kumari, W/o Rahul Kumar, R/o Vill.-Amarpur, P.S. Muhamadpur, Dis. -Gopalganj.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Naresh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Madan Kumar Mr. Indrajeet Bhushan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 26-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State. The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 504, 506, 498A/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and are father-in-law, mother-in-law, brother-in-law and sister-in-law of the informant. It is next submitted that the dispute of the informant is with her husband
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17688 of 2022(3) dt.26-09-2022 2/2 in which the entire family members have been implicated. It is next submitted that even the husband is availing his remedies available in law and has filed his anticipatory bail application which is presently pending adjudication before this Court.
The learned counsel for the informant as well as learned A.P.P. opposes the bail application.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, are directed to be released on bail on their furnishing bailbonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Mohammadpur P. S. Case No.256 of 2021, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. The application stands allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T