Ranjit Sonar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12782 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-227 Year-2018 Thana- AIRPORT District- Patna ====================================================== RANJIT SONAR, aged about 30 years (Male), Son of Shri Bhushan Sonar, R/o Village- Pokharia, Ward No. 36, P.S- Town Thana, District- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amrit Abhijat, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 07-03-2019 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail registered for the offences punishable under Sections 379, 420, 411 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against petitioner is of cheating the informant on account of cleaning the gold ornaments. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case merely on the basis of suspicion. Nothing was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12782 of 2019(2) dt.07-03-2019 2/2 two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Hawai Adda P.S. Case No. 227 of 2018, subject to conditions:

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/- U T