Vishal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4708 of 2022 ====================================================== 1.

Vishal Kumar Son of Brijnandan Prasad, Resident of Village- Chanderi, P.S. Sabour, District- Bhagalpur.

2.

Pramod Kumar @ Pramod Kumar Mandal Son of Shivnarayan Mandal, Resident of Village- Shrichak, P.S. Sanhaulla, Distt- Bhagalpur. 3.

Birendra Kumar Bharti Son of Prasadi Yadavi, Resident of VillageShrichak, P.S. Sanhaulla, Distt- Bhagalpur. 4.

Md. Salim Son of Md. Liyakat, Resident of Village- Ward No. 5, Sanhaulla, P.S. Sanhaulla, Distt- Bhagalpur.

5.

Dhananjay Kumar son of Sudin Mandal, Resident of Village- Sakrama, P.S. Sanhaulla, Distt- Bhagalpur.

6.

Savita Kumari @ Savita Devi W/o Ram Pratap Sah, D/o Tukkan Sah, Resident of Village- Ward No. 2, Sakrama, P.S. Sanhaulla, Distt- Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary Old Secretariat, Patna. 2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development, Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Personnel and Administrative, Reforms, Bihar, Patna.

4.

The District Magistrate, Bhagalpur.

5.

The District Education Officer, Bhagalpur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajive Ranjan Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Madanjeet Kumar (Gp20) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 09-11-2023

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s):- "1(i) For direction of a Writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction commanding the respondents to absorb the petitioner on the Post of Class III as well as Class IV of they have worked as instructors for a

Patna High Court CWJC No.4708 of 2022(2) dt.09-11-2023 2/2 period of about three years under the scheme of Government of India known as non formal Education."

2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioners to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, for redressal of their aforesaid grievances. Liberty so sought is granted.

3. The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Saurav/- U