← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./22740/2024allowed

Baldev Chauhan v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-15Mr. Justice Sunil Dutta Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22740 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-106 Year-2023 Thana- MANPUR District- Nalanda ====================================================== 1.

Baldev Chauhan, Son of Shivnandan Chauhan Resident of vill.-Dhanraj Bigha, P.S.-Manpur, Distt.-Nalanda (Bihar Sharif) 2.

Badi Kumar Son of Shivnandan Chauhan Resident of vill.-Dhanraj Bigha, P.S.-Manpur, Distt.-Nalanda (Bihar Sharif) 3.

Chhoti Kumar Son of Shivnandan Chauhan Resident of vill.-Dhanraj Bigha, P.S.-Manpur, Distt.-Nalanda (Bihar Sharif) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Onkar Nath, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Tarun Prasad Mandal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 15-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with G.R. No. 3083 of 2023, arising out of Manpur P.S. Case No. 106 of 2023, instituted under Sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 354(B), 379, 447 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, allegation against the petitioners are that they assaulted the husband of the informant on his head and ear with iron rod.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22740 of 2024(2) dt.15-04-2024 2/2 case. Both parties are neighbours and due to dispute between the children for playing of cricket, some altercation took place between the parties due to which there is case and counter case. The injuries on the husband of the informant are simple in nature caused by hard and blunt substance. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submission of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned concerned Court where the case is pending in connection with G.R. No. 3083 of 2023, arising out of Manpur P.S. Case No. 106 of 2023, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) rakhi/- U T