Chandrabhusan Kumar @ Sahul Don @ Chandra Bhusan Kumr v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16383 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1835 Year-2025 Thana- PHULWARISHARIF District- Patna ====================================================== Chandrabhusan Kumar @ Sahul Don @ chandra Bhusan Kumr son of Manoj Prasad Thakur Resident of Village- Jai Hind Colony, Ward no. 18, PsPhulwari Sharif, Dist- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Saket Anand For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Madhura Nand Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 17-04-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in Phulwarisharif P. S. Case No.1835 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 8(c), 21(b), 8, 20(b)(ii)(a) of the NDPS Act and Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Excise Act.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is in custody since 14.11.2025. It is next submitted that in sum and substance the allegation against the petitioner is that 15.20 grams of smack along with 2.81 grams of ganja and 06 bottles of liquor was recovered from his possession.
4. It is further submitted that even presuming what
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16383 of 2026(2) dt.17-04-2026 2/2 has been alleged is true without admitting, then the allegation of recovery of smack and ganja is not of commercial quantity. It is reiterated and submitted that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the regular bail application.
6. Since allegation is of recovery of smack and ganja, as such, the Court, for the present, is not inclined to release the petitioner on bail.
7. The prayer of the petitioner for regular bail stands rejected.
8. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. (Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T