Sunil Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8411 of 2016 ======================================================
1. Sunil Kumar, Son of Late Kewal Prasad, resident of Vednagar, Rukunpura, Police Station Rupashpur, District Patna.
2. Raj Kumar, Son of Late B. N. Prasad, resident of 202-E Keshav Place, Khajpura, Police Station Airport, District Patna.
3. Shyam Kumar, Son of Late R. N. Chaudhary, resident of Doctor's Colony, Kankarbagh, Police Station Kankarbagh, District Patna. .... .... Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna
2. The Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Old Secretariat, Patna
3. The Additional Secretary, General Administration Department, Old Secretariat, Patna
4. The Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, Bailey Road, Vishwesharaiya Bhawan, Patna
5. The Principal Secretary to Chief Minister, Chief Minister Secretariat, Old Secretariat, Patna
6. The Secretary, Law Department, Old Secretariat, Patna
7. The Secretary, Bihar Public Service Commission, 15, Bailey Road, Patna.
.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Khursid Alam, Advocate Mr. Rupak Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Pushkar Narain Shahi- AAG-10 For the B. P. S. C. : Mr. Sanjay Pandey, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) 13-05-2016 Heard Mr. Khursid Alam, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, and Mr. Pushkar Narain Shahi, learned Additional Advocate General No.10, appearing on behalf of the State respondents. Also heard Mr. Sanjay Pandey, learned Counsel appearing for the Bihar Public Service Commission. Learned Counsel for the petitioners seeks permission
Patna High Court CWJC No.8411 of 2016 (2) dt.13-05-2016 2/2 to withdraw this application with liberty to approach this Court with appropriate application or take recourse to the appropriate provisions of law upon decision of the S.L.P. (Civil) No. 29770 of 2015, which is presently pending in the Supreme Court. No objection has been raised to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioners.
In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioners to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and/or take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.
(I.A. Ansari, ACJ.) (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.) Uday/- U