Nusrat Jahan @ N. Jahan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.669 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3605 of 2020 ====================================================== 1.
Nusrat Jahan @ N. Jahan, Wife of Late Md. Aftab Alam, Resident of House No-85/1, Road No.7, Haroon Nagar Sector-1, P.S.- Phulwari Sharif, DistrictPatna. 2.
Md. Sami Ahmad, Son of Late Md. Khalil, Resident of Mohallah- Gayas Nagar, Nohsa, P.S.- Phulwari Sharif, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar.
2.
Dr. Safeena A. N., Daughter of Not known to the petitioner, The Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Minority Welfare, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3.
Sri S. Siddharth Son of not known to the petitioner, The Additional Chief Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.
Sri Md. Irshadullah, Son of not known to the petitioner, The Chairman, Bihar State Sunni Waqf Board, 34 Ali Imam Path (Hardin Road), Patna. 5.
Sri Khurshid Anwar Siddiqui, Son of not known to the petitioner, The Chief Executive Officer, Bihar State Sunni Waqf Board, 34 Ali Imam Path (Hardin Road) Patna 6.
Md. Aslam, Son of Late Salim, Resident of Mohalla-Khalilpura, P.O. and P.S.-Phulwari Sharif, District-Patna.
7.
Ashiq Rasool, Son of Late Abdus Samad, Resident of Mohalla-Makhdoom Rasti Nagar, P.O. and P.S.-Phulwari Sharif, District-Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Md. Anis Akhtar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sita Ram Yadav, GP-16 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 07-02-2025 Heard the parties.
2. In view of the averments made in the show cause affidavit as well as the order passed by the Sunni Waqf Board and the State Government, the copies of which have been placed in the show cause affidavit filed on behalf of opposite party no.
Patna High Court MJC No.669 of 2023(6) dt.07-02-2025 2/2 4 and 5, the continuation of the contempt proceeding need not warranted.
3. The contempt petition stands disposed off. (Harish Kumar, J) supratim/- U