Dharmendra Choudhary @ Dharmendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17896 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-663 Year-2021 Thana- DAUDNAGAR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Dharmendra Choudhary @ Dharmendra Kumar Son Of Jagrup Choudhary R/O Mohalla- Baluganj, P.S.- Daudnagar, District- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 18107 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-663 Year-2021 Thana- DAUDNAGAR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== VINOD CHOUDHARY @ VINOD KUMAR Sonof Bindeshwari Choudhary Resident of Village - Mohalla Baluganj, P.s.- Daudnagar, Distt.- Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 17896 of 2022) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Tribhuwan Narayan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 18107 of 2022) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Tribhuwan Narayan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 12-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. It is a case of recovery of illicit liquor from the back of Sone river.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17896 of 2022(2) dt.12-08-2022 2/2 further submits that no incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious or constructive possession of the petitioners and the name of the petitioners have transpired on the basis of secret information and they have not been apprehended at the spot.

Learned APP appearing for the State opposed the anticipatory bail.

Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-IX-cum-Special Judge, Excise-II, Aurangabad in connection with Daudnagar P.S. Case No. 663 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U T