Suresh Prasad Sah @ Suresh Sah v. Babloo Sah And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8593 of 2015 ====================================================== Suresh Prasad Sah @ Suresh Sah Son of Late Sitaram Sah Resident of Village - Rampur Routa @ Rauta, P.S. Kusheshwar Asthan, District - Darbhanga.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. Babloo Sah Son of Late Arjun Sah Resident of Village - Rampur Routa @ Rauta, P.S. Kusheshwar Asthan, District - Darbhanga.
2. Rajeshwar Sah.
3. Badri Nath Sah
4. Dina Nath Sah
5. Shashi Prasad Sah all Son of Late Bishwanath Sah
6. Champa Devi Wife of Late Bishwanath Sah
7. Bilo Sah Son of Late Sitaram Sah
8. Umesh Sah Son of Bilo Sah
9. Vinod Sah Son of Bilo Sah
10. Sanjay Sah Son of Suresh Sah
11. Santosh Sah Son of Suresh Sah
12. Uma Shankar Sah Son of Late Sitaram Sah
13. Retaish Kumar Son of Uma Shankar Sah
14. Munna Sah Son of Late Arjun Sah All are residents of Village - Rampur Routa @ Rauta, P.S. Kusheshwar Asthan, District - Darbhanga.
15. The District Magistrate, Darbhanga.
16. The Superintendent of Police, Darbhanga.
17. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Biraul, District - Darbhanga.
18. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Biraul, District - Darbhanga.
19. The Station House Officer, Kusheshwar Asthan, District - Darbhanga. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Mishra, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sanjeet Kumar Singh, Ac to AAG- 10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. NATH ORAL ORDER
Patna High Court CWJC No.8593 of 2015 (2) dt.16-07-2015 16-07-2015 After some argument, Mr. Mishra, the learned counsel for the petitioner prays to withdraw this writ application with liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate higher authority by filing petition for redressal of his grievances. The learned counsel for the respondent 3rd set is present and has raised no objection.
The prayer is allowed.
The writ application is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
If such petition is filed before the higher authority, the same shall be considered and disposed of in accordance with law expeditiously.
(V. Nath, J) Devendra/- U