Mukesh Kumar v. Ragni Devi And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Revision No.687 of 2014 ======================================================

1. Mukesh Kumar Son of Late Ram Charitra Sharma R/o Village Nayagaon (Pachkhutti), P.S. Parbatta, District Khagaria .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. Ragni Devi D/o Jyotish Chandra choudhary R/o Mohalla Chhoti Khanzarpur, P.S. Barari, District Bhagalpur

2. The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : NONE For the State : Mr. Prem Kumar Jha (App) For O. P. No. 1 : Mr. Patanjali Rishi, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-12-2016 Heard learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Opposite Party No. 1 and learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the State. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner.

Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Opposite Party No. 1 has drawn my attention to the order of this Court, dated 22.10.2014, from which it appears that the petitioner had undertaken to deposit balance amount of interim maintenance as directed by the Court below. He submits that the said amount has not been deposited and thus after having availing benefit of grant of bail by the said order of this Court, dated 22.10.2014, he has

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.687 of 2014 (3) dt.22-12-2016 2/2 breached the undertaking given by him, which has been recorded in the said order. He further submits that such undertaking was also a reason why this Court had allowed him to go on bail.

For non-appearance of the petitioner, this application stands dismissed.

The bail granted to the petitioner by the said order, dated 22.10.2014, stands cancelled.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.) Prabhakar Anand/- U √ T √