← Library
Patna High CourtCR. APP (SJ)/3309/2017allowed

Mahendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2017-12-15Mr. Justice Birendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.3309 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -17 Year- 2017 Thana -SALAIYA District- AURANGABAD ====================================================== Mahendra Yadav S/o. late Harihar Yadav, R/o. village- Hasanpur, P.S. Salaiya District- Aurangabad (Bihar) .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Smt Usha Kumari No-1, SPP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 15-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the refusal of prayer for bail by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge (S.C./S.T. Act), Aurangabad, in connection with Salaiya Police Station Case No.17 of 2017 registered under Sections 147/436/427/506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(i) (r)(w) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. It appears that on identical footing some other coaccused Lalan Yadav and others have been allowed bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court in Cr. Appeal (SJ) No.3270 of 2017.

Learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3309 of 2017 (3) dt.15-12-2017 P2/ for bail.

Hence, let the appellant, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with Salaiya Police Station Case No.17 of 2017, with condition that the appellant shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellant.

Accordingly, the appeal stands allowed.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Mkr./- U T