Md. Zahirul Haque v. Managing Committee Of Madrasa Basharatia And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Letters Patent Appeal No.1126 of 2016 ====================================================== Md. Zahirul Haque Son of Late Badrul Haque resident of village and P.O. Hussainpur, P.S. Rohika, District - Madhubani at and P.O. Kherma Pathra Via Keotiranway District - Darbhanga .... .... Appellant/s
Versus
1. Managing Committee of Madrasa Basharatia at village and P.O. Kherma Pathara via Keotiranway Darbhanga through its Secretary Mufti Ejaz Ahmad Quasmi S/o Dr. Abdul Razik resident of village - Kherma Pathara, Via - Keotiranway, P.S. Keoti, District - Darbhanga
2. The State of Bihar through Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna
3. The Director ( Higher Education ) Department of Education, New Secretariat, Patna
4. The Joint Director ( SE. Wrongly Written High Education ) Department of Education, Patna
5. The I.T. Manager, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna
6. District Education officer, Darbhanga District Darbhanga
7. The Bihar State Madrasa Education Board, 5, Vidyapati Marg P.S. Kotwali, District - Patna
8. The Chairman, Bihar State Madrasa Education Board 5, Vidyapati Marg, P.S. Kotwali, District - Patna
9. Secretary, Bihar State Madrasa Education Board,5, Vidyapati Marg, P.S. Kotwali, District District Patna .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Durga Nand Jha, Advocate Mr. Naseem, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Shakil Ahmad Khan, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 16-03-2017 Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we see no reason to grant any indulgence in the interlocutory order when the prayer of the petitioner is pending consideration before the writ court.
Patna High Court LPA No.1126 of 2016 (7) dt.16-03-2017 2/2 Interest of justice would be met in case the learned writ court is requested to hear all concerned and dispose of the writ petition finally on merit within a reasonable period preferably within six months.
Let the matter be placed for consideration before the appropriate Bench as per roster.
(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U