Patna High CourtCR. MISC./47898/2017bail granted

Ranjit Kumar Bhagat @ Ranjo Bhagat v. The State Of Bihar

2017-10-12Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.47898 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -403 Year- 2017 Thana -AMARPUR District- BANKA ====================================================== Ranjit Kumar Bhagat @ Ranjo Bhagat, son of Late Moti Prasad Bhagat, resident of Village- Amarpur, Police Station- Amarpur, District- Banka. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Praveen Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anand Kishore Choudhary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 12-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Amarpur P.S. Case No. 403 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Allegation is of recovery of 9.540 litres of liquor from the bushes near the paltry firm of the petitioner. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has falsely been implicated in this case and no recovery has been made from his possession and he has nothing to do with the seized articles. Further submission is that he is in custody for more than one month having no criminal antecedent.

Heard learned APP also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47898 of 2017 (2) dt.12-10-2017 2/2 Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge-II, Banka, in connection with Amarpur P.S. Case No. 403 of 2017, subject to the following conditions :- (1) One of the bailors shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable properties in the jurisdiction of court concerned, (2) If involvement of the petitioner in such type of cases is found in future, his bail bond shall be cancelled.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U