Patna High CourtCR. MISC./17692/2022bail granted

Tinku Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-09-28Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17692 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-369 Year-2017 Thana- KHAGARIA District- Khagaria ====================================================== TINKU KUMAR, SON OF ASHOK CHAUDHARY, R/O VILLAGEDURGAPUR, P.S.- MUFFASIL, DISTRICT- KHAGARIA ... ... Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ranjeet Kumar Singh,Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Parmanand Kumar,A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 28-09-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner shall remove all the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter within three weeks from today.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner in the present case is seeking regular bail in connection with Khagaria(Muffasil) P.S. Case No.369/2017, G.R. No. 1557/2017 (S.Tr.No.248/2018) registered for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 307, 302, 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner has three criminal antecedent. He is in custody since 19.05.2018.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that earlier the prayer for bail of the petitioner was allowed vide order dated 10.08.2021 passed in Cr.Misc.No. 38817/2020 but he could not be released on bail because he had not disclosed his criminal antecedents in the previous bail application. It is submitted that now the petitioner has disclosed his

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17692 of 2022(2) dt.28-09-2022 2/2 criminal antecedents of three cases in Paragraph '3', and he is on bail in all the three cases.

Learned APP for the State has though opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner but does not dispute the aforesaid submission.

Having regard to the facts and circumstance of the case wherein the petitioner had been earlier granted privilege of bail in Cr. Misc. No. 38817 of 2020 vide order dated 10.08.2021 but he could not be released on bail because he had not disclosed his criminal antecedents in the previous bail application but now the petitioner has disclosed his criminal antecedents of three cases in Paragraph '3', and the learned counsel submits that he is on bail in all the three cases, this Court directs release of the petitioner on bail on submission of bail bonds in terms and order dated 10.08.2021 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 38817 of 2020, subject to the conditions mentioned therein.

This writ application stands disposed of accordingly. Certified copy of the order will be made available only after removal of the defects.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) tusharika/- U T Note: The ordersheet duly signed has been attached with the record. However, in view of the present arrangements, during Pandemic period all concerned shall act on the basis of the copy of the order uploaded on the High Court website under the heading 'Judicial Orders Passed During The Pandemic Period'.