Dinesh Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4899 of 2022 ====================================================== 1.

Dinesh Tiwari Son of Ram Baran Tiwari Resident of Vilalge and P.O. and P.S.-Sarmera, District-Nalanda.

2.

Parveen Kumar @ Parveen Kumar Pranay Son of Rajeshwari Prasad Singh Resident of Vilalge and P.O. and P.S.-Sarmera, District-Nalanda. 3.

Smt. Sangita Kumari Wife of Sudhir Vishwakarma. Resident of Vilalge and P.O. and P.S.-Sarmera, District-Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Panchayat Raj, Department, of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The District Officer-Cum-Collector, Biharsharif, Nalanda. 3.

The District Panchayati Raj, Officer, Nalanda at Biharsharif 4.

The Block Development officer, Sarmera, P.S.-Sarmera, P.S.-Sarmera, District-Nalanda at Biharsharif 5.

The Panchayat Secrerary, Panchayat Sarmera, P.S.-Sarmera, DistrictNalanda at Biharsharif ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ram Nibash Prasad, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Satya Vrat, AC to GP-10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 20-12-2022 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "1(A). Issuance of an appropriate writ / order / direction commanding respondents to enquire into / cause inquiry of, the works of NALI-GALI under the scheme Mukhya Mantri Nischaya Yojna done in the year 20172018 and 2018-2019 pertaining to ward nos.04 and 05 Sarmera Panchayat, afresh by a team of expert

Patna High Court CWJC No.4899 of 2022(2) dt.20-12-2022 2/2 in presence of the petitioners and after considering the case of the petitioners, for giving a specific, clear and unambiguous report with regard to the works, referred to above as well as the role of the petitioners making them subject to penal/coercive action or not;

B. Any other reliefs for which the petitioners are entitled to."

After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioners to avail such other alternative remedies as are available under the law. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U