Umesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9763 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Umesh Kumar, S/o- Late Moti Lal Chaudhary, R/v- Purandarpur, P.S.- Jakkanpur, Distt.- Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Managing Director of Bihar State Power (Holding) Company Limited, Viduyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

3. The West Bangal State Electricity Distributor Company Limited (WBSEDCL), Viduyut Bhawan, Block- DJ, Secter-2, Bidhan Nagar, Kolkatta- 91.

4. The Managing Director, Power Grid Corporation of India Limited (a Govenment of India Enterprises).

5. The Managing Director, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, 3079/3, Sadiq Nagar, J.B. Tito Marg, New Delhi.

6. The Managing Director, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (a Government Of India Enterprises), 17, Jamshedji , Tata Road, Mumbai400020. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Jai Shankar Barnwal, GA-5 Mr. K.D. Chatterji, Sr. Advocate Mr. Amlesh Kumar Varma, Advocate Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Advocate For Respondent No.2 : Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh, Advocate For Respondent No.1 : Mr. Sanjay Kumar AC to GA-5. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ) 27-06-2016 Heard Mr. Vijay Kumar Sinha, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Sanjay Kumar, learned Assistant Counsel to Government Advocate No.5, appearing on behalf of the Staterespondents. Heard also Mr. K.D. Chatterji, learned Senior Counsel, appearing on behalf of respondent No.5, and Mr. Vinay

Patna High Court CWJC No.9763 of 2016 (2) dt.27-06-2016 2/2 Kirti Singh, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of respondent No.2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to approach this Court with appropriate application in future.

No objection has been raised to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner.

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

(I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Mkr./- U