Dhrub Singh @ Dhrub Kumar @ Dhruv Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18080 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-470 Year-2022 Thana- BIHPUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== DHRUB SINGH @ DHRUB KUMAR @ DHRUV KUMAR SINGH SON OF SURESH SINGH R/O VILLAGE- HARIO, P.S.- BIHPUR, DISTRICTBHAGALPUR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajive Ranjan Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Jharkhandi Upadhyay ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 12-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. As per prosecution case, when the informant was going to house of his Mausi, one Sanjiv Kumar Singh had called him on mobile phone and insisted him to come at Mirkal Jalkar upon which informant went and saw that co-accused Avdhesh Sharma, Pappu Sharma, Bullet Sharma, Dhrub Singh, Arun Paswan along with others 4-5 unknown persons were already

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18080 of 2023(2) dt.12-05-2023 2/3 present. It is further alleged that the co-accused started firing from northern side of the boat and due to aforesaid firing Sanjiv Kumar Singh died on spot and the informant also got injured due to firing as two bullets hit on his leg.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. He has committed no offence. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner rather the specific allegation against co-accused Pappu Sharma and Avdhesh Sharma, who shot fired on the deceased, due to which he died. There is no specific overt act against the petitioner of firing. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition. He is languishing in judicial custody since 21.09.2022.

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 1st

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18080 of 2023(2) dt.12-05-2023 3/3 Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nauachia, Bhagalpur in connection with Bihpur P.S. Case No. 470 of 2022. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U T