Chandan Yadav @ Chandan Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.51968 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -446 Year- 2017 Thana -FORBESGANJ District- ARRARIA ======================================================
1. Chandan Yadav @ Chandan Kumar Yadav, S/o Taranand Yadav @ Tarachand Yadav, Resident of Village- Katahara, Ward No.2, P.S.- Forbesganj, District- Araria.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Tarun Prasad Mandal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 09-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
The petitioner is in custody since 20.06.2017 in connection with a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 399/402 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that only on speculation the petitioner has been taken into custody. Save and except his own mobile phone, no other recovery has been made nor was he put on the T.I. Parade.
Considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51968 of 2017 (2) dt.09-11-2017 2/2 Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Forbesganj P.S. Case No. 446/2017, subject to the following conditions:-
(1) One of the bailors will be his own relative, namely, father, mother, brother, sister and/or their wife.
(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.
(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) Saif/- U T