Suraj Kumar And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17010 of 2015 (2) dt.28-05-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.17010 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -53 Year- 2014 Thana -MAHESI DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Suraj Kumar son of Shivshankar Giri

2. Amar Kumar son of Shatrudhan Mahto, Both are resident of villageKasva, Mehsi Dargah, P.S.- Mehsi, District- East Champaran, Motihari .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jitendra Kr.Roy 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 28-05-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 363 and 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Considering that there is no allegation against the Petitioners of having sexually exploited the alleged victim, let the petitioners above named, who have fair antecedents, be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order in connection with Mehsi P.S. case No.53 of 2014 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Smt. Sangita Rani, J.M., 1st class, Sadar, Motihari, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as also conditions (i) That one of the bailor

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17010 of 2015 (2) dt.28-05-2015 will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners.

The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioners, (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioners are not an accused in any other case and if they are they shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (v) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled.

(Anjana Prakash, J) Narendra/- U T