Jinaman Rai @ Jitendra Rai @ Jivnandan Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17737 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2 Year-2026 Thana- AWTARNAGAR District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

Jinaman Rai @ Jitendra Rai @ Jivnandan Rai son of Late Raghunandan Rai Resident Of Village- Ramgadha, ps- Awatarnagar, Dist- Chapra, Saran 2.

Kindeo Rai @ Kundeo Rai son of Late Ragunandan Rai Resident Of Village- Ramgadha, ps- Awatarnagar, Dist- Chapra, Saran 3.

Arjun Rai @ Arjun Kumar son of Vidya Rai Resident Of VillageRamgadha, ps- Awatarnagar, Dist- Chapra, Saran 4.

Bhim Rai @ Bhim Kumar son of vidya Rai Resident Of Village- Ramgadha, ps- Awatarnagar, Dist- Chapra, Saran 5.

Abhay Kumar son of Umesh Rai Resident Of Village- Ramgadha, psAwatarnagar, Dist- Chapra, Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nalin Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bharat Lal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 29-04-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no.1 and 2 have antecedent of four cases and rest of the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that Bhim was cutting tree on his land, thus

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17737 of 2026(2) dt.29-04-2026 2/3 the informant objected and came back home, thereafter 8 named accused persons came to his house and Bhim, Vidya and Arjun assaulted him by sword and tengari causing injury on head and all the accused assaulted his wife, it is further alleged that accused intended to grab his land.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicate in the instant case by the informant. It is further submitted that on account of dispute relating to land, the occurrence is alleged to have taken place. It is also submitted that the land belongs to the side of the petitioners but then informant is claiming the said land to be his. It is next submitted that even allegation of assault is not specific and the injury suffered by the injured has been opined to be simple in nature as would manifest from the injury report annexed as Annexure-2 to the anticipatory bail application.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17737 of 2026(2) dt.29-04-2026 3/3 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Awtarnagar P.S. Case No.02/2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T