Patna High CourtCWJC/9577/2012dfd for non appearance

Awadhesh Kumar Sinha And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-09-22Mr. Justice Birendra Prasad Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9577 of 2012 ======================================================

1. Awadhesh Kumar Sinha son of Late Shubh Narain Prasad, resident of Village - Kartahan Jagdishpur, P.O. Kartahan, P.S. Lalganj, District - Vaishali

2. Nawalesh Kumar Sinha son of Late Shubh Narain Prasad, resident of Village - Kartahan Jagdishpur, P.O. Kartahan, P.S. Lalganj, District - Vaishali

3. Naresh Kumar Sinha son of Late Shubh Narain Prasad, resident of Village - Kartahan Jagdishpur, P.O. Kartahan, P.S. Lalganj, District - Vaishali .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Director of Consolidation, Bihar, Patna

3. The Deputy Director of Consolidation, Hazipur, District - Vaishali

4. The Consolidation Officer, Lalganj, District - Vaishali

5. Vijay Singh Son Of Late Parmeshwar Singh Resident Of Village - Kartahan Buzurg, P.O. Kartahan, P.S. Lalganj, District - Vaishali

6. Mohan Singh Son Of Late Parmeshwar Singh Resident Of Village - Kartahan Buzurg, P.O. Kartahan, P.S. Lalganj, District - Vaishali

7. Sheo Kumar Singh S/O Chulhai Singh Resident Of Village - Kartahan Buzurg, P.O. Kartahan, P.S. Lalganj, District - Vaishali .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 : Mr. Krshna Kr.Singh, AC to GP 17 For the Respondent Nos. 5 to 7 : Mr. Nityanand, Advocate Mr. Shailesh Kr.Sinha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER ------------- 22-09-2015 Despite repeated calls, none appears on behalf of the petitioners in support of the present writ petition, though name of learned counsel for the petitioners is printed in the daily cause list. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submit that against the order impugned, the petitioners have alternative and efficacious remedy before learned Bihar Land Tribunal, Patna and therefore, on that ground alone, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed.

Be that as it may, since none is appearing on behalf of

Patna High Court CWJC No.9577 of 2012 (3) dt.22-09-2015 2/2 the petitioners, the writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.

(Birendra Prasad Verma, J) Tahir/- U