Rajeev Kumar Sah @ Rajeev Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18509 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-100 Year-2021 Thana- MATIHANI District- Begusarai ====================================================== Rajeev Kumar Sah @ Rajeev Sah S/o Manik Sah Resident of Village and Post Bihat, P.S.- Barauni (F.C.I.), District- Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Braj Bhushan Poddar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Pushpa Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 16-08-2022 Let the defect, if any, be removed within two weeks from today.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Matihani P.S. Case No. 100 of 2021 lodged under Sections 363, 365/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation as per prosecution against the petitioner is that he has abducted the victim for murder.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He further submits that the allegation made in the F.I.R. is out and out false, the case has been filed on the basis of suspicion only. He further submits that petitioner is in custody since 22.11.2021,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18509 of 2022(3) dt.16-08-2022 2/2 charge-sheet has already been filed in this case. On the point of his two criminal antecedents, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since in both the cases he has already been granted bail and ready to fulfill all the conditions laid down by the Court.
Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the angle of conspiracy is supported in various paragraphs of the case diary, and particularly paragraph no. 83 of the case diary categorically indicates the reason as to why this commission has been committed by the petitioner. In the above facts and circumstances and the submissions made above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at present.
With this observation, the bail application stands rejected.
(Dr. Anshuman, J.) ritik/- U T