← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/5739/2023dismissed

Md. Kaishar Ansari @ Sagar Sarkar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-10-16Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5739 of 2023 ====================================================== Md. Kaishar Ansari @ Sagar Sarkar son of Late Mojipur Rahman @ Shudhanshu Sarkar, Resident of Village-Talkhapur, Thana-Punaura, DisttSitamarhi (Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Department of Home, Govt. of Bihar.

2.

The District Magistrate, Sitamarhi.

3.

The Director General of Police, , Bihar.

4.

The I.G. Muzaffarpur, Bihar.

5.

The D.I.G., Muzaffarpur, Bihar.

6.

The Superintendent of Police, Sitamarhi 7.

The SHO Punara, Sitamarhi 8.

Firoz Nasari, son of Faraque Ansari, Resident of Village-Talkhapar, Ward No.-12, P.O.-Dumra, Distt.-Sitamarhi, Bihar, Pin Code-843301. 9.

Halima Khatoon, Wife of Faraque Ansari, Resident of Village-Talkhapar, Ward No.-12, P.O.-Dumra, Distt.-Sitamarhi, Bihar, Pin Code-843301. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pushpendra Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Saroj Kumar Sharma, AC to AAG-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 16-10-2023 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "1(i). For direction upon a respondent authority to consider the circumstances of threat and perception prevailing against the petitioner and his child for providing adequate protection against the life and property of the petitioner and his child.

(ii). For further considering the representation

Patna High Court CWJC No.5739 of 2023(2) dt.16-10-2023 2/2 as given by the petitioner against his prevailing a threat and perception and begs an adequate remedy under the law so that the petitioner could lead his life along with three children peacefully."

2.

After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U