← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./21145/2016rejected

Nageshwar Das And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2016-05-19Mr. Justice Birendra Prasad Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.21145 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -81 Year- 2015 Thana -CHAKAI District- JAMUI ======================================================

1. Nageshwar Das, Son of Late Degan Das

2. Sita Ram Das, son of Late Doman Das

3. Sandesh Das, son of Late Chhotan Das, All 1 to 3 are Resident of Nawadih, P.S.- Chakai, District- Jamui .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anirudh Kumar Sinha, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Damodar Pd.Tiwary, APP For the Informant : Mr. Shaukat Alam, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 19-05-2016 Heard the parties including the learned counsel for the informant.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a criminal prosecution registered under Section 307 and some other allied offences under the Indian Penal Code.

At the very outset, learned counsel for the informant submits that the petitioners have concealed the material facts that they are accused in some other criminal cases also besides the present one. In support of his above contention, he has produced summons issued to the accused petitioners, though in paragraph 3 of the anticipatory bail application it has been stated that the antecedents of the petitioners are clean.

It appears that the petitioners have deliberately concealed the material facts about their criminal antecedents. In above view of the matter, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners in connection with Chakai P.S.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21145 of 2016 (2) dt.19-05-2016 Case No.81 of 2015 (G.R.No.1167 of 2015) pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui is rejected. Now, the petitioners should surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today and apply for regular bail.

Let the copy of the summons, produced by the learned counsel for the informant, be kept on the record. (Birendra Prasad Verma, J) Arvind/- U T