← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/14301/2014disposed

Sunil Kumar Sinha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-08-24Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14301 of 2014 ===========================================================

1. Sunil Kumar Sinha son of Brajnandan Prasad Singh resident of village - Bind, P.O. AND Police Station - Bind, District - Nalanda, at present working as an Assistant teacher in Middle School Bind, Anchal - Bind, District - Nalanda. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director, Primary Education, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Magistrate / District Officer, Nalanda, Biharsharif.

4. The Deputy Development Commissioner cum Chief Executive Officer, Nalanda, Biharsharif.

5. The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Patna Division, Patna.

6. The District Education Officer, Nalanda, Biharsharif.

7. The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Nalanda, Biharsharif.

8. The Programme Officer, Nalanda, Biharsharif.

9. The Block Education Officer, Bind, District - Nalanda. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vikash Kumar For the Respondent/s : Dr A. K. Upadhyay, SC 2 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 24-08-2016 Petitioner is looking for a direction upon the respondents to grant him graduate trained scale. He is an Assistant Teacher in a Middle School.

There were reasons at the prevalent time when the question for grant of such benefit of others was taken up because petitioner was under suspension and a departmental proceeding was also contemplated and initiated.

All that has come to rest in view of the decision dated

Patna High Court CWJC No.14301 of 2014 dt.24-08-2016 2/2 5.4.2016 contained in Annexure- 8 to the supplementary affidavit of the petitioner.

Counsel for the State takes a stand in paragraph 12 of the counter affidavit that in view of the above developments, the District Primary Promotion Committee will consider the case of the petitioner when the next meeting is held.

Writ is disposed of in view of the above with a hope that such a meeting would be convened and held preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this order.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) sk AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 24.8.2016 Transmission Date