← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/13941/2014dismissed

Pankaj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-08-06Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13941 of 2014 ====================================================== Pankaj Kumar son of Late Arbind Paswan, resident of village P.O.- Rani Diyara, Police Station- Budhuchak Kahalgaon, District- Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar and Ors 2.

The Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3.

The Home Secretary, Home Special Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 4.

The Director General of Police, Police Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 5.

The Secretary, Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe, Welfare Department, Bihar, Patna 6.

The Director, Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Welfare Department, Bihar, Patna 7.

Deputy Director, Welfare Pramandal, Bhagalpur Pramandal, Bhagalpur 8.

The Commissioner, Bhagalpur Commissionary, Bhagalpur 9.

The District Magistrate, Bhagalpur 10.

The Deputy Collector Establishment, Bhagalpur 11.

The Senior Superintendent of Police, Bhagalpur 12.

The District Welfare Officer, Bhagalpur ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Deepak Kumar Sinha For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Rajeev Shekhar CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 06-08-2019 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the respondents-State.

Petitioner in the instant proceedings has claimed appointment of class III and IV post on account of killing of his father as he was a victim of scheduled caste category. Specific case of the respondents in the counter affidavit is that in view of extant provision arising out of

Patna High Court CWJC No.13941 of 2014(3) dt.06-08-2019 2/2 Resolution dated 20.12.2010, entitlement of the petitioner on account of father being killed is restricted to compassionate subsidy which has already been paid to the dependent of the deceased.

Claim of the petitioner in the instant proceedings is not sustainable as scheme only provides payment of compassionate subsidy which petitioner has received. Averments made in the counter affidavit are also not disputed or denied by filing any rejoinder.

Writ petition is dismissed.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) s.hassan/- U