Dasrath Kumar @ Dashrath Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18584 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-231 Year-2021 Thana- JAHANABAD District- Jehanabad ====================================================== DASRATH KUMAR @ DASHRATH KUMAR SON OF BINDESHWARI PRASAD R/O VILLAGE- DAHARPUR, P.S.- GHOSHI, DISTRICTJEHANABAD ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ajay Kumar Sharma For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Lalan Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 29-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Jehanabad P.S. Case no. 231 of 2021 instituted for the offence punishable under Section 365 of the Indian Penal Code. Prosecution case relates to missing of the informant's daughter, who had performed love marriage on 26.03.2018 with the petitioner. On 21.3.2021, while the wife of the informant make a call to her victim daughter, she got her number switch off then she contacted the petitioner upon which he replied that she left the house without informant anybody and till yet she is trace-less.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18584 of 2022(3) dt.29-11-2022 2/2 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Wife of the petitioner had filed an informatory petition on 1.5.2018 before the court of learned CJM, Jehanabad in which she had expressed threatening of her life by her brother and other family members.
Learned counsel for the informant and learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of bail and submitted that petitioner is husband of the victim lady and he is responsible to care his wedded wife with honour and dignity to which he has not done .
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that petitioner is husband of the informant's daughter, who is still traceless, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner and, as such, his application for bail is rejected.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U