Md. Naushad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.43396 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-74 Year-2018 Thana- BAJPATTI District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Md. Naushad, son of Md. Elliyash, Resident of Village- Muraul, Police Station- Bajpatti, District- Sitamarhi.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Madhubala Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar -2, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 20-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Bajpatti P.S. Case No.74 of 2018, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 406/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the F.I.R., on 07.04.2018 there was talk about transaction of money at the door of the present petitioner. The petitioner abused the informant's father and on protest the accused persons including the petitioner assaulted the informant and his father and in that course the petitioner gave iron rod blow on the head of the informant's father.

Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43396 of 2018(2) dt.20-07-2018 2/2 case, let the petitioner, namely, Md. Naushad, be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Pupri, District- Sitamarhi, in connection with Bajpatti P.S. Case no.74 of 2014, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Further condition is that whenever the police will call the petitioner for the purposes of investigation and interrogation, he will remain present for the investigation. In the event of being absent on two consecutive dates without reasonable explanation, the present order will be treated to have been cancelled.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) pawan/- U T