Satyam Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16407 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-21 Year-2025 Thana- SIKANDRA District- Jamui ====================================================== Satyam Kumar Son of Bhanu Pratap Singh Resident of Village - Karma, P.S.- Sikandara, District - Jamui.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mayank Bilochan, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rita Verma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH CHANDEL ORAL ORDER 15-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the counsel appearing for the respondent-State.

2. It is the first regular bail application submitted by the petitioner who has been arrested in connection with Sikandara P.S. Case No. 21 of 2025 dated 17.01.2025 for the alleged offences punishable under Section 126(2), 308(5), 115(2), 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. According to the case of prosecution, on 17.01.2025 at 05:00 A.M. when the victim Sonu Kumar was going towards Lakhisarai allegedly, on his way the present applicant stopped him and then some dispute took place between them and at that time the present applicant assaulted him from the back side of the country made pistol and due to that he sustained injuries on his head. On the basis of information given by the informant, offences has been registered. During the course of investigation, the present applicant

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16407 of 2025(3) dt.15-05-2025 2/2 was arrested on 17.01.2025 and since then he is in custody.

4. It is submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner herein is innocent and is falsely implicated in this case due to some previous dispute with the complainant. He further submits that in this case he is in custody since 17.01.2025 and only one injury has been sustained by the victim which is simple in nature. Therefore, it is prayed that on these grounds he may be granted benefit of bail.

5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondentState opposes the prayer of bail.

6. Considering the submission made by the counsels and further considering the detention period as well as the nature of injury sustained by the victim, I am of the view that in this case the present applicant should be granted the benefit of bail. Accordingly, the petition is allowed. The petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Sikandara P.S. Case No. 21 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties, to the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate - 1st Class, Jamui.

(Arvind Singh Chandel , J) Siddharth Soni/- U T