← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./26027/2015dismissed

Bhual Sah @ Bhual Turaha And ANR. v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2023-02-15Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26027 of 2015 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1042 Year-2013 Thana- WEST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Bhual Sah @ Bhual Turaha and Anr.

2.

Bharat Turaha @ Bharat Sah Turaha Both are sons of Late Khobhari Turaha @ Bhukhal Turaha, resident of village- Turaha Toli, P.S. Ram Nagar, District- West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

Akhilesh Sah, Son of Yugal Sah, resident of Turaha Toli, P.S. Ram Nagar, District- West Champaran.

3.

Most. Mauliya @ Bhantuliya, wife of Asharfi Sah, resident of villageSingari, P.S. Bagaha, District- West Champaran. 4.

Upendra Rai Halka Karamchari, Circle Office Ram Nagar, P.S. Ram Nagar, District- West Champaran.

5.

Ajay Kumar, the then Circle Officer, Circle Office Ram Nagar, P.S. Ram Nagar, District- West Champa ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Indra Kr. Singh App ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 15-02-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The present application has been filed for quashing the order dated 07.01.2015 passed by learned Sessions Judge, West Champaran at Bettiah in Criminal Revision No. 224 of 2014, by which cognizance has been taken for the offence under Sections 323 of Indian Penal Code.

Considering the materials available on record, no ground

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26027 of 2015(2) dt.15-02-2023 2/2 for quashing of the order dated 07.01.2015 taking cognizance for offence under Sections 323 of Indian Penal Code against the petitioners is made out.

Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for and is permitted to withdraw this application to raise all their grievances at the stage of framing of charge, if the charge has not already framed.

Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Saif/- U T