← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/5150/2022dismissed

Shivam Kumar, v. The State Of Bihar,

2023-11-29Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5150 of 2022 ====================================================== Shivam Kumar, Son of Sri Ashok Singh, Resident of Village - Bagahi Bhelwa, Post Bhelwa Circle, Police Station - Ghorasahan, District - East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar, through Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The District Magistrate, East Champaran.

3.

The Deputy Development Officer, East Champaran. 4.

The Block Development Officer, Ghorasahan Block, East Champaran. 5.

The Block Coordinator, Ghorasahan Block, East Champaran. 6.

Radhesyam Kumar Singh, Son of Sri Shyam Kumar Singh, Resident of Village Bagahi Bhelwa, Post Bhelwa Circle, Police Station - Ghorasahan, District - East Champaran.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Vinay Kirti Singh ( GA- 2 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 29-11-2023 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "1. That the present writ application is being filed on behalf of the petitioner above named for issuance of appropriate writ/writs, order/orders for direction to respondent authorities to consider the complaint / representation dated 05.03.2022 filed by the petitioner and to set aside the selection of respondent no.6 on the post of Swacchata Supervisor in Gram Panchayat Bagahi

Patna High Court CWJC No.5150 of 2022(2) dt.29-11-2023 2/2 Bhelwa in Ghorasahan block of East Champaran, as he had much less merit point than the petitioner and for any other order/orders which the petitioner may found to be entitled in the facts and circumstances of the case."

2.

After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the respondents authorities for redressal of his aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The present writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U