Santushti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.40669 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1032 Year- 2017 Thana -SAHARSA District- SAHARSA ====================================================== Santushti Kumari daughter of Nageshwar Prasad Yadav resident of Village - Sonpura, Ward No. 11, P.S. - Bakhtiyarpur, District - Saharsa. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nityanand ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 13-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
Petitioner apprehends her arrest in connection with Saharsa (Sadar) P.S.Case No. 1032 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 467, 468 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 10 of the Bihar Conduct of Examination Act, 1981.
Allegation against the petitioner as per FIR is that petitioner was examinee of Bihar Secondary Examination, 2017 and her bar code was pasted in the copy of one Priyanka Kumari. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that from the impugned order it appears that in this case it transpired that three persons are responsible, including one Rajiv Ranjan, who is cousin brother of the petitioner and that Rajiv Ranjan and
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40669 of 2018 (2) dt.13-07-2018 2/2 others have been granted privilege of anticipatory bail by learned court below itself and petitioner has no hand in that, who is a student.
Heard learned APP also.
Having heard both sides and in the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, named above, in the event of her arrest or surrender, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa, in connection with Saharsa (Sadar) P.S.Case No. 1032 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. and further condition is that one of the bailors shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable properties within the jurisdiction of court concerned. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U