Ranvir Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27156 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-84 Year-2020 Thana- MANSI District- Khagaria ====================================================== Ranvir Yadav, Son Of Bhupendra Yadav, Resident of Village - Rohiyar, P.S.- Mansi and Distt.- Khagaria.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Md. Najmul Hodda, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 31-01-2022 This matter has been taken up for hearing online because of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner is expected to honour his undertaking to remove the defects as pointed out by the office when called upon to do so by the office. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Mansi P.S. Case no. 84 of 2020 instituted for the offence under Sections 332, 307, 353, 186, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1-B)a, 26, 35, 27 of the Arms Act. As per allegation in the FIR, the informant after receiving secret information in connection with Mansi P.S. Case No. 82/2020, reached at Dhamahara Station where all the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27156 of 2021(2) dt.31-01-2022 2/3 accused persons were gathered and after seeing the police personnel, they started to flee away but three of them were apprehended on the spot and one of them is succeeded to flee away. The name of the petitioner is disclosed by the apprehended accused persons as absconder. Recovery of one country made pistol, seven live cartridge, amount of Rs. 6,000/- and a mobile has been made and accordingly, a seizure list was prepared.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has got no criminal antecedent. The name of the petitioner has been disclosed in this case by the apprehended accused persons, which has no evidentiary value in the eye of law. Neither the petitioner was arrested nor any incriminating article has been recovered from his possession. Petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery.
Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27156 of 2021(2) dt.31-01-2022 3/3 four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Mansi P.S. Case no. 84 of 2020, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U T