← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./19738/2024bail granted

Usha Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2024-03-22Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19738 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-35 Year-2024 Thana- RAHUI District- Nalanda ====================================================== Usha Devi wife of Late Babulal Chaudhary Village- sherpur PS- Rahui District- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raj Kishor Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bishweshwar Ram ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 22-03-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a woman and allegation is of recovery of 30 liters of liquor from a place near the house of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from her conscious possession and even the alleged recovery is from a place which does not belong to the petitioner and she came to be implicated at the instance of the Chowkidar based on suspicion for the reason that the recovery was from a place which is adjacent to her house. It is also submitted that in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19738 of 2024(2) dt.22-03-2024 2/2 majority of the case, the police is implicating innocent persons either at the instance of Chowkidar or local people but then if the Chowkidar was aware that the liquor belonged to the petitioner then why he did not inform the police earlier to institution of the FIR, which casts as aspersion on the case of the prosecution.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 1,000/- (Rupees One Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Rahui P.S. Case No. 35 of 2024 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T