← Library
Patna High CourtCR. REV./684/2014dismissed

Kundan Kumari @ Kanchan Singh v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2016-12-22Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Revision No.684 of 2014 ======================================================

1. Kundan Kumari @ Kanchan Singh, Wife of Sri Sanjay Kumar Singh Resident of Village - Maheshpur, P.S.- Munger Mufassil in th Distrit of Munger and Daughter of Sri Ram Sagar Chaudhary presently residing in the Village - Parmanand Pur, P.S.- Cheriya Bariyarpur in the District of Begusarai.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Son of Sri Pramod Shankar Singh, Resident of Village - Maheshpur, P.S.- Munger Muffasil in the District of Munger presently residing at Ganga Vihar Colony Tekari Road, P.S.- Sultanganj in the District of Patna.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Akhileshwar Pd. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Amrit Anunay, Adv.

Mrs. Anita Kumari Singh, Adv.

For the State : Mr. Arvind Kr. Panday (App) For the O.P. No. 2 : Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Adv. ======================================================

CORAM:

HONOURABLE MR.

JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-12-2016 Heard the parties.

The petitioner is the wife of opposite party No. 2, who has filed Complaint Case No. 935C of 2011, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Begusarai. The

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.684 of 2014 (4) dt.22-12-2016 2/2 offence alleged is punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. It appears that opposite party No. 2 was granted bail by the learned court below, which was subsequently cancelled by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Begusarai, vide an order dated 27.01.2014. The said order, dated 27.01.2014, was challenged by the petitioner, which has been allowed by the learned Sessions Judge, Begusarai, vide an order, dated 16.06.2014, passed in Cr. Revision No. 139 of 2014. This criminal revision application, under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, has been filed against the said order, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Begusarai, dated 16.06.2014.

Considering the nature of dispute, I am not inclined to entertain this criminal revision application. This application is, accordingly, dismissed.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Praveen-II/- U T