Shivbalak Manjhi@Shivbalak Majhi@Shiv Balak Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17073 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-371 Year-2019 Thana- MOTIPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== SHIVBALAK MANJHI@SHIVBALAK MAJHI@SHIV BALAK MANJHI SON OF LATE YUGESHWAR MANJHI RESIDENT OF VILLAGESANDHA JAHANGIRPUR, PS- MOTIPUR, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR, ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bhavesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Akhileshwar Dayal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 11-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per prosecution case, all the accused persons took the son of the informant for attending a feast and later on the informant came to know, that all the accused persons after killing her son thrown the dead body in a pond. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. He has committed no offence. He submitted that entire allegation against the petitioner is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17073 of 2023(2) dt.11-05-2023 2/2 concocted and frivolous. He further submits that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner. The other co-accused has already been granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench vide order dated 17.11.2021 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 23467 of 2021 and the case of this petitioner stands on similar footing. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition. He is languishing in judicial custody since 30.03.2022. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge 19th, Muzaffarpur in connection with Motipur P.S. Case No. 371 of 2019.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U T