Mithun Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.2342 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -203 Year- 2017 Thana -BELDAUR District- KHAGARIA ===========================================================
1. Mithun Yadav,
2. Prince Yadav @ Pris Yadav, Both are sons of Buchi Yadav @ Indradeo Yadav,
3. Govind Yadav, Son of Kapildeo Yadav, All are resident of Village- Bela Naubad, Police Station- Beldaur, District- Khagaria. .... .... Appellant/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s :
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sadanand Paswan, SPP =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 06-07-2018 No one appears on behalf of the appellants.
This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the refusal of prayer for bail by order dated 06.06.2018 by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Khagaria, in connection with Beldaur Police Station Case No.203 of 2017 registered under Sections 341,325,323,504,506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 3(i)(r)(S) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and Section 3/4 of Witch Prevention Act.
Considering the nature of offences under the
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2342 of 2018 dt.06-07-2018 2/2 Indian Penal Code which are mostly bailable, let the appellants, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with the aforesaid case, with condition that both bailors shall be resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below and further the appellants shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellants.
Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and this appeal stands allowed.
(Birendra Kumar, J) Nitesh/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date10.07.2018 Transmission Date 10.07.2018