← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/9697/2016disposed

Md. Rahamtullah And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2023-10-18Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9697 of 2016 ====================================================== 1.

Md. Rahamtullah Son of Lutfur Rahman Resident of Village- Bansdih, Panchayat Ghoshram, PS Hayaghat, District Darbhanga. 2.

Gopal Ram Son of Late Bihari Ram Resident of Village- Pourma, PSHayaghat, District Darbhanga. 3.

Amarnath Jha Son of late Ram Padarath Jha Resident of Village- Pouram , PS Hayaghat, District Darbhanga.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Commissioner cum Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Patna.

2.

The Commissioner Cum Secretary, Human Resources Development Department , Patna.

3.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms, Govt of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Director, Mass Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 5.

The District Magistrate, Darbhanga.

6.

The Distrioct Adult and Non-Formal Education Officer, Darbhanga. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shambhu Nath Jha, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.S.D.Yadav, AAG-9 Mr. Braj Bhushan Mishra, Ac to AAG-9 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 18-10-2023 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1. That by this writ petition, the petitioners pray for issuance of writ/ writs, Rule/Rules and direction/ directions upon the respondents to consider their case for their absorption or rehabilitation under State Govt. to serve the State according to their education qualification either

Patna High Court CWJC No.9697 of 2016(2) dt.18-10-2023 2/2 Class-III or Class IV post as per the vacancies available, who have worked for more than three years continuously as instructors under nonformal Education Scheme of the State Govt. which has now been abolished.

And any other relief or reliefs for which they be found entitled in law be granted to them." 2.

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioners to approach the respondent authorities for redressal of their subsisting grievances, if any. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U