Neeta Kumari v. Sri Deepak Singh, The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.704 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12126 of 2021 ====================================================== Neeta Kumari, W/o Late Binod Kumar Verma, R/o Flat No. 102, Apurva Apartment, Shivaji Path, P.S. - Gardanibagh, District - Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Sri Deepak Singh, the State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

Sri Sanjay Kumar, the Director Secondary Education, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

Srimati Sunaina Kumari, the Regional Deputy Director of Education, Patna Division, Patna.

4.

Sri Amit Kumar, the District, Education Officer, Patna. 5.

Sri Arun Kumar Mishra, the District Programme Officer, Patna. 6.

Shri Praveen Kumar Singh, the Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajeev Kumar Singh, Advocate Ms. Rushali, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Venkatesh Kirit, AC to GA- 2 For Respondent No.6 :

Mrs. Nivedita Nirvikar, Sr. Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 27-06-2025 Heard the parties.

2. The present application came to be filed for initiating a contempt proceeding against the opposite parties for their willful and deliberate disobedience of order dated 24.11.2022, passed in C.W.J.C. No. 12126 of 2021, whereby this Court allowed the writ petition with a direction to the respondent authorities to ensure payment of rest of the retiral benefits of the petitioner within a period of eight weeks.

Patna High Court MJC No.704 of 2023 dt.27-06-2025 2/2

3. A supplementary show-cause affidavit has been filed on behalf of opposite party no.5. It is categorically averred that in compliance of order of this Court, vide Memo No. 1685 dated 13.02.2025, the department has sanctioned Rs.1,91,939/- for payment of due salary of the petitioner.

4. Mr. Venkatesh Kirti, learned Advocate for the State submits at the Bar that all the retiral benefits, as also the amount, as has been disclosed in para.5 of the supplementary show-cause affidavit, has been credited in the account of the petitioner.

5. Considering the averments made in the supplementary show-cause affidavit and the submissions advanced by the learned Advocate for the State, the present contempt application stands dismissed.

(Harish Kumar, J) uday/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 30.06.2025 Transmission Date NA