← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./34912/2014disposed

Dr. Syed Md. Nazib Bihari @ Md. Imran @ Nazeeb Bihari v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-09-06Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.34912 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -237 Year- 2014 Thana -GAYA COMPLAINT CASE District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Dr. Syed Md. Nazib Bihari @ Md. Imran @ Nazeeb Bihari s/o Mozib Bihari, residence of 98/191-C-1, Mohalla- Kalumal Bagicha, behind Rupam Talkies, Bekanganj, District- Kanpur (U.P.)- 208001 .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Syeda Tarranum Bano w/o Dr. Syed Md. Nazib Bihari @ Md. Imran @ Nazeeb Bihari D/o of Late Mahmudul Hassan, residence of Mohalla- Quazi, PO+PS- Sherghati, Dist- Gaya, Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Awadhendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Parmanand Pd.(App) Mr. S. Jamil Akhtar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 06-09-2017 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and also learned counsel for opposite party No.2. Considering the fact that the parties have not settled their dispute amicably, this Court has no option but to dispose of the application with liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate application before the Court below. It is expected that the Court below will make all efforts for amicable settlement of dispute between husband and wife and refer the matter to the mediation centre at Gaya and in the event, the parties entered into compromise and resolve their dispute amicably and restore their normal conjugal life, the Court will record compromise and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34912 of 2014 (11) dt.06-09-2017 2/2 dispose of the entire case on the basis of such compromise irrespective of the fact that the offence alleged is compoundable or not in view of the Judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court reported in (2013)4 SCC 58 Jitendra Raghuvanshi Vs. Babita Raghuvanshi.

With the aforesaid observation, the application stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Sanjeev/- U T