← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./50581/2017bail granted

Satyendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2017-11-13Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.50581 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -292 Year- 2017 Thana -BRAHMPUR District- BUXAR ======================================================

1. SATYENDRA YADAV, Son of Shankar Yadav, resident of VillageAkdar, P.S.- Brahampur, District- Buxar. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sudhir Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Suresh Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 13-11-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Brahampur P.S.Case No.292 of 2017 registered for offences punishable under Sections 457 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is recovery of one laptop from his possession.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has been arrested and no such recovery has been made from the possession of the petitioner and his signature has been obtained by force. He is in custody for about 2 1⁄2 months and he undertakes to abide by any condition imposed upon him. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50581 of 2017 (2) dt.13-11-2017 2/2 circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Buxar in connection with Brahampur P.S.Case No.292 of 2017.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and in the event of failure to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.

(iv) The petitioner shall appear before the local police station in the first week of each month for six months so that the police may watch his conduct, otherwise his bail bond shall be cancelled.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T