← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./16016/2020dismissed

Minhaj @ Minhajul Islam v. The State Of Bihar

2020-07-15Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16016 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5 Year-2017 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Araria ====================================================== MINHAJ @ MINHAJUL ISLAM Son of Gayasul Islam Resident of VillageRampur, Mohanpur, Ward No.6, P.S.-Araria, Bairgachi, District-Araria. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Tej Pratap Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr.Aditya Nr Singh.1, Addl Public Prosecutor ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-07-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code on the allegation that in the wee hours of 1.3.2017 the petitioner forcibly entered in the room of the informant and committed rape on her.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this concocted case lodged by his bhabhi on account of death of his brother in which her father had been made accused. He further submits that the informant is mother of three children and has implicated him in a pre-planned manner to pressurize the witnesses of Sessions Trial No. 495 of 2016. Section 164 Cr.P.C. statement of the victim has been lodged after three years' delay without explanation.

Learned counsel for the State points out aforesaid victim's statement in which she has made specific allegation against the petitioner that this petitioner entered into the room of the informant and forcibly ravished her.

Considering the facts of the case, prayer for

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16016 of 2020(2) dt.15-07-2020 2/2 anticipatory bail to the petitioner is refused with direction to surrender and seek regular bail which would be considered on its own merit without prejudice.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U T