← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./54339/2017disposed

Kedar Pandit @ Kedar Pandey v. The State Of Bihar

2017-11-15Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54339 of 2017 (2) dt.15-11-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.54339 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -42 Year- 2017 Thana -DARIHAT District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Kedar Pandit @ Kedar Pandey Son of Late Sudama Pandit, R/o VillageSumbha, P.S.- Agrer, District- Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sada Nand Roy For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Brajendra Nath Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 15-11-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Darihat P.S. Case No. 42 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Section 25(1-b)a, 26, 27 and 35 of Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of recovery one country made pistol and it further appears that petitioner is accused in five other cases of similar nature. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case at the instance of police as he is accused in other cases of similar nature and in fact nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner in this case and he has been in custody since 09.06.2017. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54339 of 2017 (2) dt.15-11-2017 Having heard both sides, considering the fact and circumstances of the case and also the fact that petitioner is accused in five other cases of similar nature, at this stage, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail rather this application is disposed of with direction to the court below to release the petitioner to his own satisfaction once charge is framed in this case or petitioner completes six months of judicial custody, whichever is earlier.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T