Patna High CourtCR. MISC./22854/2025dismissed

Dharamvir Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-01Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22854 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1136 Year-2022 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE - PATNA CITY District- Patna ====================================================== Dharamvir Prasad S/o Mithilesh Prasad R/o Village- Bhadaru Bigha, PSNagarnausa, Distt- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pramod Kumar Chakravarti, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Anant Kumar 1, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Ram Nibash Pd. Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 01-09-2025 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with C.A. Case No. 1136 of 2022 registered for the offence under Sections 420, 323, 504, 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the complainant has alleged that he being handicapped person, after the death of his parents, was helpless when the petitioner came to his rescue and asked that if he hand over the money, he will take care of him for his entire life. Believing his word, the complainant executed an agreement for sale on a plain paper which resulted into coughing of amount of Rs.15,85,000/- which he handed over to the petitioner and the document was signed on 02.03.2022.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22854 of 2025(4) dt.01-09-2025 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. The petitioner is in custody since 05.10.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as the fact that the petitioner has cheated the entire property of a physically challenged person, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, this application for regular bail is hereby rejected.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) anand/- U T