Srikant Mahto v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51058 of 2017 (2) dt.13-11-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.51058 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -73 Year- 2015 Thana -GARKHA District- SARAN ======================================================
1. Srikant Mahto, Son of Late Sukhdeo Mahto, Resident of VillageMithepur, P.S. Garkha, District-Saran. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Upendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Rajeev Nayan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 13-11-2017 Heard the parties.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Garkha P.S.Case No.73 of 2015 registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 308, 379, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against the petitioner is of assault on the head causing injury to the informant.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the FIR itself shows that the scuffle took place between the parties, in which same occurrence has taken place and the injuries are simple in nature. The petitioner is in custody for three months. Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51058 of 2017 (2) dt.13-11-2017 circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-V, Saran at Chapra in connection with Garkha P.S.Case no.73 of 2015, G.R.No.1275 of 2015.
With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and in the event of failure to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T